Two recent events have brought the future of celebrity appearances to light — initial reports thatBruce Willishad sold his rights to a deepfake company, allowing his “digital twin” to appear in future projects, and confirmed reports thatJames Earl Jones’ signed over the rights to his voice recordings to an A.I. companyto be used in future projects, including vocals for Darth Vader inStar Warsfilms and television series. While the reports aboutWillis are now denied by the actor, both reports showcase a fascinating move forward in technology, keeping beloved actorsalivein future projects. A newDie Hardmovie with a John McClane in his prime, or a Darth Vader series, for example. But is that a good thing? The short answer is no. However, the answer is more complex than a simple yes or no.
RELATED:Did Bruce Willis Just Change Movies and TV Forever?
Can This Technology Be Used Well?
Used wisely, these technologies have definite benefits. For the director whose film has suffered the loss of an actor in a major role, deepfake technology offers salvation that would otherwise require reshoots, script revisions, or the scrapping of the film altogether. An extreme example can be seen in the cult classic filmPlan 9 From Outer Space. ActorBela Lugosidied during the filming of the movie and was replaced by a larger, younger man (a chiropractor by trade) who kept his cape over his face to keep the “illusion” alive. If the technology existed back then (and was wildly affordable), directorEd Woodmay have had some options other than trying to pass off another actor as Lugosi.
More recently,Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalkerwas forced (no pun intended) to use old footage of actressCarrie Fisherin order to bring Princess Leia’s story to an end, a story that wassupposed to feature the character in a much larger role but was instead revisedto make the old footage somehow fit the narrative (and most would argue it simply didn’t work). It’s not to say that it would be a path taken, but would have at least been a viable option. The surprise use of deepfake technology to bringMark Hamill’s post-Return of the JediLuke Skywalker to life inThe Mandalorianwas just that, a welcome surprise and a technology used sparingly for the sake of the story. Likewise, to hear the voice of Vader booming as it had in Jones' prime was a welcome addition to his presence in theObi-Wan Kenobiseries.
We Need to Let Roles Be Passed On
But Hollywood has never been known to use things wisely or sparingly, and when boardrooms take decisions out of the hands of the artists the results are rarely good. Rebooting an adored franchise is one thing, but rebooting it with the original characters in their prime? Money in the bank. Why search for the new John McClane when you can simply use Bruce Willis as often as you’d like? James Bond, Indiana Jones, and even a newHome Alonefeaturing youngMacaulay Culkinare all possibilities where the original actors never have to leave the part. The magic that wasMel BlancorJim Hensoncan come back to voice the characters they became synonymous with. And that is an issue.
Think of the actors cast as characters after the original actor has moved past the role.Chris Pineas Captain James T. Kirk inStar Trek.Daniel Craigas James Bond.Brandon RouthorHenry Cavillas Superman. These actors all paid homage to the past but managed to make their own mark in the role, something that wouldn’t happen ifWilliam Shatner,Sean Connery, orChristopher Reevekept being used repeatedly for the characters they became famous for. Voiceover roles for iconic characters wouldn’t be available for different talent to bring something new (yours truly actually can do a mean James Earl Jones if you’re listening, Hollywood!).
Who Should Get Credit?
The door then becomes open to a whole new issue: credit. What if a deepfakeClint Eastwoodfrom his Spaghetti Western days is nominated for an Oscar? Who accepts the reward? Eastwood? He didn’t do anything apart from sign a contract. The unknown actor who does all the work under the guise of the film icon? The multiple employees of the deepfake company that had a hand in bringing the character to life? It’s performance by committee. Even worse, though, is the opposite. What if that same deepfaked Eastwood appears in a newDirty Harryfilm that is absolutely reviled by critics and fans alike? It potentially tarnishes the character, tarnishes the actor, the actor’s legacy, and/or the future of a franchise that had been comfortably, and successfully, laid to rest years before.
Some Things Can’t Be Deepfaked
Truthfully, though, even if you discard the arguments above as conjecture and wild imagination about a future that may not ever exist, there is one definitive reason why these technologies will never fully work:soul. It’s the unknown tics of a character’s actions or voice that are unique to the actors portraying them, and that is something that can’t be reproduced. Think ofHarrison Fordlooking into the Well of Souls inRaiders of the Lost Arkto see the floor alive with snakes. The look in his eyes, the roll onto his side, and the defeated resignation in his infamous line “Snakes. Why did it have to be snakes?” The way he brings the character to life is a combination of all of these things. Think of Darth Vader taunting Luke during their lightsaber battle inReturn of the Jedi: “Yes, your thoughts betray you. Your feelings for them are strong. Especially for…Sister!So, you have a twin sister. Your feelings have now betrayed her too.” The way that Jones paces the lines, and the inflection he gives each word, is more than simply reading off of a script. It, too, is a performance, as fully realized as any physical portrayal, and it’s something that can’t simply be pushed through a computer.
So, Hollywood. You have in your hands an explosive and exciting new set of technologies that could keep your brightest lights alive for years, but, please: only use as needed.
